In short, while the Court found that the Hills knowingly made false representations to the lender, the lender's claim that it "reasonably relied" on these representations doesn't hold water, because "stated income guidelines" are not reasonable things to rely on. In essence, the Court found, such lending guidelines boil down to what the regulators call "collateral dependent" loans, where the lender is relying on nothing, at the end of the day, except the value of the collateral, not the borrower's ability or willingness to repay. If you make a "liar loan," the Judge is saying here, then you cannot claim you were harmed by relying on lies. And if you rely on an inflated appraisal, that's your lookout, not the borrower's.
This is going to give a lot of stated income lenders--and investors in "stated income" securities--a really bad rotten no good day. As it should. They have managed to give the rest of us a really bad rotten no good couple of years, with no end in sight.
It seems to me that this is very large news. If stated income HELOCs are dischargeable there are going to be more writedowns .. if i read this right. This story just gets better and better.
I wonder what fmr-Sen Gramm, McCain's economics guru would have to say about this.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Not moderated but I do delete spam and I would rather that people not act like assholes.