Wednesday, January 12, 2011
Sarah Palin can STFU about Blood Libel
Blood libel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: "Blood libel (also blood accusation[1][2]) refers to a false accusation or claim[3][4][5] that religious minorities, almost always Jews, murder children to use their blood in certain aspects of their religious rituals and holidays.[1][2][6] Historically, these claims have–alongside those of well poisoning and host desecration–been a major theme in European persecution of Jews.[4]"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hey, it was blood libel. It was libel that used the shed blood of innocent victims to attack Sarah Palin.
ReplyDeleteI don't even like Palin, but what the Left did was wrong and wicked.
What did Sheriff Dupnik know about Loughner & when did he know it? http://bit.ly/eQ5ehk
"He is politically active supporting conservative causes and serves as a precinct committeeman in the 29th Legislative District for the Pima County Republican party and a State Committeeman for the Arizona GOP."
ReplyDeleteNice resume ... i am sure that you are a completely unbiased observer.
nice blog you have btw, you write well (no, not snark).
Hi Rob, just wanted to clarify that Cholla Jumps isn't my blog. I just liked his message. BloodLibel, with the graphics proving Palins map didn't use crosshairs, is my blog.
ReplyDeleteobserverusa: you are showing too many sockpuppets.
ReplyDeleteI sadly cannot say anything nice about your site. It opens up with a known-to-be-photoshopped graphic and goes down hill from there.
As for your research about the targets/bulls eyes/surveyor marks i have this to say. why didn't Gov Palin say this back when they first came out? she was called out about the imagery when it first happened (including by Rep Giffords) and she said nothing about it NOT being targets.
Disingenuous doesn't even cover this attempt at re-writing history.
Thanks for engaging though. Always nice to have someone drop back, even when they don't agree with me. We can disagree without beating up on each other.