"The Thomas majority, in coming to its ridiculous decision, reads the statute and Rule as narrowly as possible to say that only the entity that actually signs the prospectus is the speaker or 'maker' of the false statements. Anyone who 'assists' the ultimate signer of the prospectus, even if that person wrote the entire fraudulent document, cannot be held not liable under these circumstances. Justice Thomas said that unless the false statements in the fund prospectuses were directly attributable to the Janus Manager in the language of each prospectus, no suit could be filed against the two Janus companies that assuredly controlled the Janus Fund (as evidenced by the market timing scheme they perpetrated)."
Some folks seem to think I occasionally have interesting things to say. I don't always agree.
Thursday, June 16, 2011
Why the Janus Ruling Matters
Booman Tribune ~ A Progressive Community:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Not moderated but I do delete spam and I would rather that people not act like assholes.