"'Well, I think in response to that direct question, I should have been much more clear during the debate, Sean,' said Pawlenty. 'I don't think we can have a nominee that was involved in the development and construction of Obamacare, and then continues to defend it. And that was the question, I should have answered it directly. Instead, I stayed focused on Obama, but the question really related to the contrast with Governor Romney. And I should have been more clear, I should have made the point that he was involved in developing it -- he really laid the ground work for Obamacare, and continues to this day to defend it. And I think that's a legitimate point in response to the question that I was asked, and I should have been more clear.'"
But he sure sounds like one.
This is beyond sad. If T-Paw doesn't have the gumption to say things straight to someone's face then he is unfit to be President. Period.
Disqualifying.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Not moderated but I do delete spam and I would rather that people not act like assholes.