Thursday, June 2, 2011

V.S. Naipaul might not be a misogynist fool

Nobel Laureate V.S. Naipaul Says No Woman Is His Literary 'Equal' : The Two-Way : NPR:
In an interview at the Royal Geographic Society on Tuesday about his career, Naipaul, who has been described as the "greatest living writer of English prose", was asked if he considered any woman writer his literary match. He replied: "I don't think so." Of [Jane] Austen he said he "couldn't possibly share her sentimental ambitions, her sentimental sense of the world".

He felt that women writers were "quite different". He said: "I read a piece of writing and within a paragraph or two I know whether it is by a woman or not. I think [it is] unequal to me."

The author, who was born in Trinidad, said this was because of women's "sentimentality, the narrow view of the world". "And inevitably for a woman, she is not a complete master of a house, so that comes over in her writing too," he said

But he certainly says things that one would say.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Not moderated but I do delete spam and I would rather that people not act like assholes.